Friday
Dec282012
Broken Area - Episode 3, Ukulele Constitutional Hockey Burping
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2695/f2695cbc73048e8c6de4c9df1edfafb028f439dd" alt="Date Date"
Hey I think we really are back to doing a podcast....
We started out by talking about comments by both Jim and Rachel from episode 2. This lead us into a discussion of gun laws in the states and the second amendment.
We went through a lot of stuff, we talked Christmas, we talked a bit about our son, Jon, and Isabelle kept accusing me of burping. I ended with a rant about the NHL lockout, not a rant so much as a lament really.
We hope you enjoy episode 3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2695/f2695cbc73048e8c6de4c9df1edfafb028f439dd" alt="Author Author"
tagged
Broken Area,
Dave Brodbeck,
Isabelle Michaud,
Podcast in
Broken Area,
Podcast
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2695/f2695cbc73048e8c6de4c9df1edfafb028f439dd" alt="Tag Tag"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2695/f2695cbc73048e8c6de4c9df1edfafb028f439dd" alt="Tag Tag"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2695/f2695cbc73048e8c6de4c9df1edfafb028f439dd" alt="Tag Tag"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2695/f2695cbc73048e8c6de4c9df1edfafb028f439dd" alt="Tag Tag"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2695/f2695cbc73048e8c6de4c9df1edfafb028f439dd" alt="Category Category"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2695/f2695cbc73048e8c6de4c9df1edfafb028f439dd" alt="Category Category"
Reader Comments (1)
Actually, amending the US Constitution is a bit more complicated even than you were saying, Dave. First new amendments have to be proposed and then they have to be ratified, and there are two methods for each. A new amendment can be proposed by either both the House and Senate have to approve it by a 2/3 vote, OR 2/3 of the state legistlatures have to ask Congress to call a national convention to propose a new amendment. (The second one has never been used, because the last time the US had a national convention to amend a constitution, we totally scrapped the Articles of Confederation and started all over, and people in power know they have no idea where that would end.) Then for ratifying a new amendment, either 3/4 of the state legislatures have to approve it, OR ratifying conventions in 3/4 of the states have to approve it. Also, the ratification can't hang around forever, slowly gathering approvals; it has to be approved within "a reasonable time" or it gets scrapped.
But I didn't say that I thought an amendment repealing the Second Amendment would succeed--it wouldn't, now. But if we never start talking about it in a serious way, it never will be repealed, so we should start considering it instead of automatically dismissing it. Considering it also would offer a better sense of proportion, and show other proposals to be the moderate tweaks that they are.
The uke is sounding good!