This form does not yet contain any fields.

    Navigation
    « That Show With Billy Wilson, Episode 39 | Main | Broken Area - Episode 2, Think Happy Thoughts and Play The Ukulele »
    Friday
    Dec282012

    Broken Area - Episode 3, Ukulele Constitutional Hockey Burping

    Hey I think we really are back to doing a podcast....

    We started out by talking about comments by both Jim and Rachel from episode 2.  This lead us into a discussion of gun laws in the states and the second amendment. 

    We went through a lot of stuff, we talked Christmas, we talked a bit about our son, Jon, and Isabelle kept accusing me of burping.  I ended with a rant about the NHL lockout, not a rant so much as a lament really.

    We hope you enjoy episode 3.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    References (1)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      Dave Brodbeck - Blog - Broken Area - Episode 3, Ukulele Constitutional Hockey Burping

    Reader Comments (1)

    Actually, amending the US Constitution is a bit more complicated even than you were saying, Dave. First new amendments have to be proposed and then they have to be ratified, and there are two methods for each. A new amendment can be proposed by either both the House and Senate have to approve it by a 2/3 vote, OR 2/3 of the state legistlatures have to ask Congress to call a national convention to propose a new amendment. (The second one has never been used, because the last time the US had a national convention to amend a constitution, we totally scrapped the Articles of Confederation and started all over, and people in power know they have no idea where that would end.) Then for ratifying a new amendment, either 3/4 of the state legislatures have to approve it, OR ratifying conventions in 3/4 of the states have to approve it. Also, the ratification can't hang around forever, slowly gathering approvals; it has to be approved within "a reasonable time" or it gets scrapped.

    But I didn't say that I thought an amendment repealing the Second Amendment would succeed--it wouldn't, now. But if we never start talking about it in a serious way, it never will be repealed, so we should start considering it instead of automatically dismissing it. Considering it also would offer a better sense of proportion, and show other proposals to be the moderate tweaks that they are.

    The uke is sounding good!

    January 2, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterRachel

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>